Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Consolidating tax agencies makes sense

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

The Orange County Register

Not only are there too many taxes on Californians, but too many arms of government collecting the taxes. A rough count finds there have been at least 20 unsuccessful attempts in 20 years to consolidate the agencies collecting everything from income taxes to underground storage tank maintenance fees.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed consolidation once again. It’s worth considering.

In his proposal to the Legislature last week, the duties of the existing Board of Equalization, Franchise Tax Board and the taxing responsibilities of the Employment Development Department would be merged into a new Department of Revenue. Savings and efficiencies are yet to be calculated, but there ought to be enough to make the change worthwhile.

Previous proposals died in the Legislature, where public employee unions hold sway. But this year a $24-billion budget shortfall is prompting closer-than-usual scrutiny to identify government fat. Obviously, three agencies aren’t needed to collect taxes.

The Board of Equalization, established in 1879 by constitutional amendment, oversees state sales and use taxes and administers fuel, alcohol, tobacco and other taxes. The board also hears business and personal income-tax appeals.

The Franchise Tax Board, created by law in 1929 to collect so-called “franchise” taxes from banks and corporations, oversees the state income tax imposed in the 1930s.

The Employment Development Department, created in 1936 to run state unemployment programs, collects payroll taxes.

Together the agencies employ more than 18,000 workers at an annual cost of $2 billion, and collect upward of $106.5 billion a year in taxes. The governor’s plan would transfer all their tax responsibilities into a new Department of Revenue, run by an appointed secretary answerable to the governor.

Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, R-Irvine, who in 2005 authored an unsuccessful constitutional amendment for a similar consolidation, told us he probably will try again, this time incorporating the governor’s ideas, but adding an elected board to run the new agency.

Mr. Schwarzenegger says the merger would “ensure centralized, effective, efficient and impartial tax revenue collection, administration and enforcement,” which would be good.


See archived 'Opinion' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


Weather
ADVERTISEMENT 
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
What do you think?
Do you support hate crime laws?
Yes
No
Don't know/No opinion
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Commentary
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site