Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Search: Site   Web

Romney, hands off second mortgages

Fresh out of the gate after basically gaining the Republican nomination for president, Mitt Romney has stumbled. He has been stung by attacks on his reported wealth of $250 million; and by President Obama’s call for a new “Buffet Rule” tax, named after billionaire Warren Buffet, of a 30 percent minimum tax on millionaires.

In response, Mr. Romney called for ending second-home mortgage deductions for wealthy people as part of his tax-reform proposals. We’re interested in any ideas he and President Obama come up with. As the Beatles sang, “You say you got a real solution. Well, you know, we’d all love to see the plan.”

But unless Mr. Romney’s idea is part of comprehensive tax reform and reduction, it could do more harm than good. The real estate market has been hammered now for five straight years, with no recovery in sight.

Many people, wealthy as well as middle-class, buy a second home to rent it out and earn extra income. Cutting out that second mortgage deduction, even if just for the wealthy, would reduce the value of those homes. That would affect the whole real-estate market, as most other homes would decline in value.

Mr. Romney’s staff said his statement was made at a private meeting; and he was just throwing out ideas. Perhaps. But he’s not just an ex-governor of Massachusetts now. He has a good chance at being the next president.

He has put forth some decent ideas. He wants to cut everybody’s tax rates by 20 percent. That would drop the top tax rate to 28 percent from 35 percent. He should have just stopped there. Even as part of a comprehensive reform, things would be made more complex with a two-tiered tax system on second homes: allowing it for the middle-class, but not the wealthy. We don’t need even more tax forms.

Moreover, although comprehensive tax reform would be nice, what’s needed right now as the economy still continues to stagnate is a quick shot of adrenaline in the form of sharp cuts in tax rates. And the tax cuts should be permanent, unlike the 2003 Bush tax cuts, which nowadays have had to be renewed a couple of times a year, casting a pall of uncertainty across business and personal budgets.

Mr. Romney, with a history of flip-flops on the issues, as the challenger needs to solidify his position as a disciplined, Reaganesque tax cutter, not as a flighty candidate who throws out unformed ideas like daisies on a pond.

The Orange County Register


See archived 'Opinion' stories »
 
Ads by Google


Profile Skills
50% off Learning Style Assessment
Weather
ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll