The Associated Press
Francine Kupsch, spokesperson for the Los Coyotes Native Indians, stands on a hilltop fronting a mountain range on the tribe's reservation in February. The rugged land is not a feasible site for a casino.
Click to enlarge
Most Viewed Stories
Most Commented Stories
Most Recommended Stories
What is this?
Save & Share this Article
Tribes challenge watershed Interior Department ruling over off-reservation casinos
Comments 0 | Recommend 0March 10, 2008 - 3:53PM
LAS VEGAS (AP) - A major policy change this year by the Department of Interior will slow the growth of the multibillion-dollar Indian casino industry, which has gained controversy for developments in communities far from reservation land.
The change, made in a series of letters and a memo issued in early January, essentially rejected 22 applications for new off-reservation casinos, including Barstow's proposed casinos, by hinging their approval on a single criterion: the distance from the reservation.
While the change was hailed by opponents of the sprawling business that raked in $25.1 billion in gambling revenues in 2006, many tribes attacked the ruling as unfair and unjust, robbing them of what many consider their only economic opportunity.
"We were shocked by the lack of due process involved," said Mark Van Norman, executive director of the National Indian Gaming Association. "The Department of Interior created a new regulatory standard one day, didn't notify anybody and applied it the next day."
The St. Regis Mohawks in upstate New York, one of two tribes that sued the department, called the decision racist and paternalistic because it purported to look out for the best interests of the tribes by supporting the integrity of reservation life.
"It's outrageous for us as Mohawk people to be told that we can't sustain our community relations," said St. Regis Chief Lorraine White.
White said male members of the tribe had for decades traveled to faraway construction sites to support their families on the reservation in upstate New York.
"What a bunch of bulls--- when you're talking to the very people who actually built New York City with their hands," White said.
When its development partner, Empire Resorts Inc., abandoned it following the change, the St. Regis tribe dropped its suit and called on Congress to overturn the policy or have its application grandfathered in.
The other tribe suing, the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, are pressing on with their suit, which alleges the department violated the due process clause of the Constitution and acted arbitrarily.
But several groups, including tribes with existing casinos, hailed the change.
Alan Feldman, spokesman for MGM Mirage Inc., the largest casino operator on the Las Vegas Strip, said the policy brought order to an unruly process that has approved dozens of off-reservation casinos in recent years.
"We've never ever had a problem with tribal gaming ... but we definitely take a position when tribes anywhere try to take land that's 300, 400, 500 miles away from their reservation and say, 'Oh, we want to do this there,"' he said.
Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, on a recent stop in Las Vegas, noted 10 of the rejected applicants sought casinos from 160 miles to 1,550 miles away from their reservations. Several crossed state lines.
He said the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was never intended to create casinos, and therefore jobs for tribal members, so far from the reservation.
"Once you begin going down that path, I don't know how you ever control it," he said. "Because the precedent would be established and then you could have gaming anywhere."
But three tribes have been approved in the past for long-distance casinos using a two-part determination that requires the approval of a state governor and the Interior secretary - including the Forest County Potawatomi's casino in Milwaukee, some 250 miles south of the reservation, in 1990.
The latest deluge of applications was prompted by a bill backed by Sen. John McCain, now the front-running Republican presidential candidate, that would have eliminated the two-part determination, but allowed tribes that had applied by April 15, 2006, to be considered.
Twenty-five applicants rushed in - only one was approved, eight are being considered and the rest were rejected. The bill ultimately died because of intense lobbying by Indian tribes.
Currently, 39 casino applications are pending, nine of them under the two-part determination rule.
The latest policy maneuver, for now, puts the Bush administration's brakes on the industry.
I. Nelson Rose, a gambling law professor at Whittier Law School, said the move effectively bars any new long-distance casino proposals from tribes.
"Ultimately as long as Bush is president, they're not going to happen," he said.
That puts some tribes, such as the Los Coyotes band in San Diego County, California, in a bind.
The impoverished tribe has 300 members, 16 of whom live on the reservation some 70 miles from San Diego.
Tribal spokesperson Francine Kupsch said there are scant economic opportunities on the mountainous reservation, which survives mainly on federal grant money.
The tribe had proposed to open a casino in Barstow, more than 150 miles away, with a northern California tribe, Big Lagoon. It was rejected with the others despite gubernatorial approval.
"It sets our tribe, my people back," Kupsch said. "We were the ones who 10 years ago received electricity for the first time and are still trying to catch up with everybody."
-----------------
Associated Press Writer Dinesh Ramde in Milwaukee contributed to this report.
The change, made in a series of letters and a memo issued in early January, essentially rejected 22 applications for new off-reservation casinos, including Barstow's proposed casinos, by hinging their approval on a single criterion: the distance from the reservation.
While the change was hailed by opponents of the sprawling business that raked in $25.1 billion in gambling revenues in 2006, many tribes attacked the ruling as unfair and unjust, robbing them of what many consider their only economic opportunity.
"We were shocked by the lack of due process involved," said Mark Van Norman, executive director of the National Indian Gaming Association. "The Department of Interior created a new regulatory standard one day, didn't notify anybody and applied it the next day."
The St. Regis Mohawks in upstate New York, one of two tribes that sued the department, called the decision racist and paternalistic because it purported to look out for the best interests of the tribes by supporting the integrity of reservation life.
"It's outrageous for us as Mohawk people to be told that we can't sustain our community relations," said St. Regis Chief Lorraine White.
White said male members of the tribe had for decades traveled to faraway construction sites to support their families on the reservation in upstate New York.
"What a bunch of bulls--- when you're talking to the very people who actually built New York City with their hands," White said.
When its development partner, Empire Resorts Inc., abandoned it following the change, the St. Regis tribe dropped its suit and called on Congress to overturn the policy or have its application grandfathered in.
The other tribe suing, the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, are pressing on with their suit, which alleges the department violated the due process clause of the Constitution and acted arbitrarily.
But several groups, including tribes with existing casinos, hailed the change.
Alan Feldman, spokesman for MGM Mirage Inc., the largest casino operator on the Las Vegas Strip, said the policy brought order to an unruly process that has approved dozens of off-reservation casinos in recent years.
"We've never ever had a problem with tribal gaming ... but we definitely take a position when tribes anywhere try to take land that's 300, 400, 500 miles away from their reservation and say, 'Oh, we want to do this there,"' he said.
Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, on a recent stop in Las Vegas, noted 10 of the rejected applicants sought casinos from 160 miles to 1,550 miles away from their reservations. Several crossed state lines.
He said the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was never intended to create casinos, and therefore jobs for tribal members, so far from the reservation.
"Once you begin going down that path, I don't know how you ever control it," he said. "Because the precedent would be established and then you could have gaming anywhere."
But three tribes have been approved in the past for long-distance casinos using a two-part determination that requires the approval of a state governor and the Interior secretary - including the Forest County Potawatomi's casino in Milwaukee, some 250 miles south of the reservation, in 1990.
The latest deluge of applications was prompted by a bill backed by Sen. John McCain, now the front-running Republican presidential candidate, that would have eliminated the two-part determination, but allowed tribes that had applied by April 15, 2006, to be considered.
Twenty-five applicants rushed in - only one was approved, eight are being considered and the rest were rejected. The bill ultimately died because of intense lobbying by Indian tribes.
Currently, 39 casino applications are pending, nine of them under the two-part determination rule.
The latest policy maneuver, for now, puts the Bush administration's brakes on the industry.
I. Nelson Rose, a gambling law professor at Whittier Law School, said the move effectively bars any new long-distance casino proposals from tribes.
"Ultimately as long as Bush is president, they're not going to happen," he said.
That puts some tribes, such as the Los Coyotes band in San Diego County, California, in a bind.
The impoverished tribe has 300 members, 16 of whom live on the reservation some 70 miles from San Diego.
Tribal spokesperson Francine Kupsch said there are scant economic opportunities on the mountainous reservation, which survives mainly on federal grant money.
She lived in a trailer with her family until the door fell off several years ago. Now she lives in a manufactured home with a blue tarp stapled to the roof to prevent leaks.
The tribe had proposed to open a casino in Barstow, more than 150 miles away, with a northern California tribe, Big Lagoon. It was rejected with the others despite gubernatorial approval.
"It sets our tribe, my people back," Kupsch said. "We were the ones who 10 years ago received electricity for the first time and are still trying to catch up with everybody."
A booming business
In 1998, Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act legalizing tribal casinos. Since becoming legal in 1988:
• Tribal casino revenues surged to $25.1 billion
• Commercial casino revenues hit $32.4 billion
• 230 of the 562 Indian tribes in the United States were running 387 casinos
• Tribal casino revenues surged to $25.1 billion
• Commercial casino revenues hit $32.4 billion
• 230 of the 562 Indian tribes in the United States were running 387 casinos
-----------------
Associated Press Writer Dinesh Ramde in Milwaukee contributed to this report.
See archived 'News' Stories »
Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.
