Most Viewed Stories
Most Commented Stories
Most Recommended Stories
Save & Share this Article
Local politicians disagree with court’s gay marriage ruling
Comments 0 | Recommend 0Call for a Constitutional amendment
The California Supreme Court’s decision to overturn a ban on gay marriage met harsh condemnation from politicians who represent Barstow and the surrounding areas.
The justices released the 4-3 decision Thursday, saying that domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage in an opinion written by Chief Justice Ron George. The decision overturns Proposition 22, which defines marriage as only between a man and a woman, and was approved in 2000 by 61 percent of California voters, and paves the way for California to become the second state where gay and lesbian residents can marry.
First District County Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt called for an amend to the state Constitution that would incorporate the provisions of Proposition 22.
“In 2000, the people of this state overwhelmingly supported Proposition 22, defining marriage in state law as a union between a man and a woman,” stated Mitzelfelt in a release Thursday evening. “With this decision, the Court has chosen to overrule the will of millions of California voters.”
Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Santa Clarita, who represents Barstow in Washington D.C., also came out against the court’s decision.
“I realize the issue of marriage is a deeply emotional and personal one for Californians and Americans, but under no circumstance should the courts be allowed to show such utter disregard for the democratic process. In this case, it appears partisan politics and personal opinions are taking precedence over the rule of law; and that’s an alarming turn of events,” he stated in a release from his office.
The cases were brought by the city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples, Equality California and another gay rights group in March 2004 after the court halted San Francisco’s month-long, same-sex wedding march that took place at Mayor Gavin Newsom’s direction.
McKeon said he will work in support of a constitutional fix to reverse the court decision. Mitzelfelt also plans to partner with state leaders to push a Constitutional amendment through.
Staff writer Brooke Edwards and the Associated Press contributed to this story.
See archived 'News' Stories »
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.









